Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Question about dmz security
From: "Johan Denoyer" <jdenoy () digital-connexion info>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 00:37:25 +0100
using this configuration makes your your firewall protecting your internal network useless... You should remove the nic interface between your ftp server and your internal network... Salutations, Johan Denoyer jdenoy () digital-connexion info Digital Connexion http://www.digital-connexion.info PGP : 0x57A6727B ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jennifer Fountain" <JFountain () rbinc com> To: <security-basics () securityfocus com> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:42 PM Subject: Question about dmz security
I need an opinion on a current design implementation in place. We have an ftp server sitting in our dmz. This box has two nics - one is plugged into the dmz hub and one is plugged into our network. I think this is a security risk and we should just allow internal users access to the box via the firewall by opening the port instead of having dual nics. they do not see a security risk. maybe i am just too new at this and need some education. what is the "best" way to implement this configuration? Thank you Jenn Fountain
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description:
Current thread:
- Question about dmz security Jennifer Fountain (Feb 14)
- Re: Question about dmz security Johan Denoyer (Feb 17)
- Re: Question about dmz security David M. Fetter (Feb 17)
- RE: Question about dmz security Peter Hamilton (Feb 17)
- RE: Question about dmz security Michael Cunningham (Feb 17)
- RE: Question about dmz security Burton M. Strauss III (Feb 17)
- Re: Question about dmz security Chuck Swiger (Feb 17)
- Re: Question about dmz security mlh (Feb 18)
- Re: Question about dmz security Chuck Swiger (Feb 19)
- Re: Question about dmz security mlh (Feb 18)
- RE: Question about dmz security David Gillett (Feb 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Question about dmz security Chris Berry (Feb 17)
- Question about dmz security John Tolmachoff (Feb 17)
(Thread continues...)