Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: RFMON detection
From: hax <uberhax () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:17:41 -0400
Being that I'm not an engineer (yet), I'm not sure I entirely understand Steven and David's replies, but it seems like RFmon would be detectable then if it wasn't for the amount of interference that pollutes the 2.4ghz spectrum? Or perhaps that it wouldn't be feasible because you'd need to have your sensor very close to the device in RFmon? I'm still a bit confused. --hax --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. Mention this ad and get $545 off any course! All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 10 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. Attend a course taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field pen testing experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills of an Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization. Visit us at: http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/ethical_hacking_training.html ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: RFMON detection, (continued)
- Re: RFMON detection mike (Jul 07)
- Re: RFMON detection pingywon MCSE (Jul 06)
- Re: RFMON detection captgoodnight (Jul 07)
- Re: RFMON detection hax (Jul 07)
- Re: RFMON detection hax (Jul 06)
- Re: RFMON detection captgoodnight (Jul 07)
- Re: RFMON detection pingywon MCSE (Jul 08)
- Re: RFMON detection Austin Godber (Jul 08)
- Re: RFMON detection hax (Jul 09)
- RE: RFMON detection David Weiss (Jul 12)
- Re: RFMON detection hax (Jul 12)
- RE: RFMON detection Steven Hess (Jul 12)
- Re: RFMON detection hax (Jul 12)
- RE: RFMON detection Jef Feltman (Jul 14)
- Re: RFMON detection captgoodnight (Jul 16)
- Re: RFMON detection captgoodnight (Jul 07)
- RE: RFMON detection Rocky Heckman (Jul 13)