Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Web Hosting / and Site Security Question
From: Adam Jones <ajones1 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 20:50:25 -0500
IMO using SSL for things like link pages should be determined by your userbase. SSL adds extra connection overhead, which makes the site crawl that much slower for dialup users. That said if the majority of your traffic is on a bigger pipe there is not much in the way of disadvantages. Although it is nice to see via a technology like SSL that you are viewing the website you think you are, the majority of users are either going to 1) not understand the technology well enough to benefit from it and be able to know the difference, or 2) understand what phishing scams are, and generally be able to distinguish them. In the end it (like always) boils down to what your customer wants, or what their customers want. If technologies like SSL will make someone more happy with their product/service, work with them to decide if the extra feature is worth the extra headache. I agree completly that they need to shop around for a security conscious provider, the additional risk of not using one is far from worth whatever savings you may get from it. -Adam
Current thread:
- Web Hosting / and Site Security Question Mailing Lists (Oct 08)
- Re: Web Hosting / and Site Security Question Steve (Oct 12)
- Re: Web Hosting / and Site Security Question Miles Stevenson (Oct 12)
- Re: Web Hosting / and Site Security Question Miles Stevenson (Oct 13)
- Re: Web Hosting / and Site Security Question Adam Jones (Oct 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Web Hosting / and Site Security Question Hamish Stanaway (Oct 14)