Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Todays dumb question
From: Gilbert Fernandes <gilbert.fernandes () spamcop net>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:29:58 +0200
There used to be a name for a technology (or way of implementing technology) to prevent electronic eavesdropping.
It's called white noise. You need real random to produce real white noise. Another solution is to use microphones and produce inverted sound waves to "cancel" sound. It can be done. White noise is cheaper but if your random source is not really random, it can be circumvented. Think of the quality of random you need the same one as required to have a proper implementation of OTP ciphers. -- unzip ; strip ; touch ; grep ; finger ; mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ; fsck ; umount ; sleep
Current thread:
- RE: Todays dumb question, (continued)
- RE: Todays dumb question Vic N (Oct 27)
- Re: Todays dumb question Austin Murkland (Oct 27)
- RE: Todays dumb question Nick Willey (Oct 27)
- RE: Todays dumb question Andrew Chong (Oct 27)
- RE: Todays dumb question David Gillett (Oct 27)
- RE: Today's dumb question Herman Frederick Ebeling, Jr. (Oct 27)
- Any research on log correlation and aggregation? ricci (Oct 28)
- RE: Any research on log correlation and aggregation? Andrew Chong (Oct 31)
- Re: Any research on log correlation and aggregation? Fred Cohen (Oct 31)
- Any research on log correlation and aggregation? ricci (Oct 28)
- Re: Todays dumb question Micheal Espinola Jr (Oct 27)
- Re: Todays dumb question Gilbert Fernandes (Oct 27)
- Re: Todays dumb question Steven Meyer (Oct 28)
- Re: Todays dumb question jontaimanglo (Oct 27)
- RE: Todays dumb question Leigh Parsons (Oct 27)
- RE: Todays dumb question Vic N (Oct 27)