Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98?
From: krymson () gmail com
Date: 26 Sep 2006 16:31:55 -0000
This depends a bit on your router/modem. You should hit up an external firewall testing page to see if 139 is really reachable from the Internet. If it is not, this is good and your router/modem is doing NAT like most modern ones should be. Sites: http://www.hackerwatch.org/probe/ or http://www.auditmypc.com/ If 139 is reachable from those sites, yes, there are still ways to get into your computer with just port 139 open. Those sites should give you more info, but suffice to say you want port 139 hidden from the world. And like you seem to already know, a system, ultimately, is only as safe as the user using it. Even with firefox and diligence, you can still let in something bad via a mis-click on an email attachment or web page. However, this is not necessarily something specific to Win98. "Theoretically, I've not enabled port forwarding in my router/modem, and so external computer trying to ping or connect to my computer should not succeed, and if there's no port listening at all (except for port 139), no other computer should be able to infilitrate right? Yet, I can't say anything is foolproof. So just like to seek your expert opinion. What are the other areas I should continue to look at to further protect my system? Is it still possible to be attacked through a listening port 139 with file sharing disabled?" --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is sponsored by: Norwich University EARN A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE - ONLINE The NSA has designated Norwich University a center of Academic Excellence in Information Security. Our program offers unparalleled Infosec management education and the case study affords you unmatched consulting experience. Using interactive e-Learning technology, you can earn this esteemed degree, without disrupting your career or home life. http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? gohyongkwang (Sep 25)
- Re: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? dave (Sep 26)
- Re: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? Frynge Customer Support (Sep 26)
- Re[2]: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? gmx (Sep 27)
- Re: Re[2]: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? Frynge Customer Support (Sep 28)
- Re: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Sep 28)
- RE: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? David Gillett (Sep 28)
- Re[2]: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? gmx (Sep 27)
- Re: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? Luchino - Samel (Sep 26)
- RE: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? Robert D. Holtz - Lists (Sep 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? krymson (Sep 26)
- Re: Re[2]: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? Gethinj (Sep 28)
- Re:No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? Colin Copley (Sep 28)
- RE: Re[2]: No NetBios share + No Open Port = Safe Win98? Jag (Sep 29)