Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity
From: Pranay Kanwar <warl0ck () metaeye org>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:52:50 +0530
This discussion has really got interesting, still i would like to make the following points. 1. What if port knocking daemon is itself vulnerable ?, then you create a another point of failure. 2. Also i am still unclear on the fact that is using a port knocking daemon would be really called obscurity ?. Regards, warl0ck // MSG http://wwww.metaeye.org
Current thread:
- RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity, (continued)
- RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Craig Wright (Apr 15)
- Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Craig Wright (Apr 13)
- Message not available
- RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Craig Wright (Apr 17)
- Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Craig Wright (Apr 15)
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity lordl3ane (Apr 13)
- Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity jbloss (Apr 13)
- Re: Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity levinson_k (Apr 15)
- RE: Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Craig Wright (Apr 15)
- Re: Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Florian Rommel (Apr 16)
- Re: Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Justin Lintz (Apr 16)
- Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Pranay Kanwar (Apr 17)
- RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Craig Wright (Apr 17)
- RE: Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Craig Wright (Apr 15)
- Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Apr 17)
- Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Michael Rash (Apr 17)
- RE: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Craig Wright (Apr 17)
- Re: Concepts: Security and Obscurity Michael Rash (Apr 17)