Security Basics mailing list archives
SSL Certificate - Internal CA vs "well known CA"
From: sfmailsbm () gmail com
Date: 6 Aug 2007 12:04:08 -0000
Dear List, Just wanted to understand why using a "well known 'trusted' CA" (e.g. verisign) is more secure than using an Internal CA to manage Certificates e.g. if a company wants to publish a non-financial site (as opposed to, say, Internet Banking) would not an Internal CA be as Secure as an external one? What is the real (security) benefit of using (expensive) external (e.g. Verisign) Certs? Thanks you for your comments
Current thread:
- SSL Certificate - Internal CA vs "well known CA" sfmailsbm (Aug 06)
- Re: SSL Certificate - Internal CA vs "well known CA" Vinicius Vianna (Aug 06)
- Re: SSL Certificate - Internal CA vs "well known CA" Pranay Kanwar (Aug 06)
- SSL Certificate: Any Recommendations on Specific Vendors Iwekani Mukoma (Aug 06)
- Re: SSL Certificate: Any Recommendations on Specific Vendors MaddHatter (Aug 08)
- Message not available
- Fwd: SSL Certificate - Internal CA vs "well known CA" kevin fielder (Aug 08)
- RE: SSL Certificate - Internal CA vs "well known CA" Burns, Doug (Aug 08)
- SSL Certificate: Any Recommendations on Specific Vendors Iwekani Mukoma (Aug 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SSL Certificate - Internal CA vs "well known CA" Eric G (Aug 08)