Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Procedural Issues
From: "Kurt Buff" <kurt.buff () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:34:38 -0700
In a full-on, large-scale production environment, code moves something like this: Dev Test Staging Production Each stage has its own set of admins/support staff, who are responsible for placing the approved software from the previous stage into their environment, according to their individual requirements. Kurt On 1/8/07, WALI <hkhasgiwale () gmail com> wrote:
In a software development environment, what risks do we have if we allowed software development team leader, access to Live production servers? Security demands that the two environments be segregated. If I segregate the two environments, who would shift the code from development to Live? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is sponsored by: ByteCrusher Detect Malicious Web Content and Exploits in Real-Time. Anti-Virus engines can't detect unknown or new threats. LinkScanner can. Web surfing just became a whole lot safer. http://www.explabs.com/staging/promotions/xern_lspro.asp?loc=sfmaildetect ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: Procedural Issues WALI (Jun 12)
- RE: Procedural Issues Dave Lewis (Jun 13)
- Re: Procedural Issues security.xentek (Jun 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Procedural Issues Kurt Buff (Jun 13)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Procedural Issues WALI (Jun 15)
- Message not available
- RE: Procedural Issues Dave Lewis (Jun 13)