Security Basics mailing list archives
Cybernanny ethics...
From: "Fabio Cerullo" <fcerullo () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:39:19 +0100
Hi All, Talking about ethics.. what do you think about these software like cybernanny, snoopstick and others which collect information from your PC in order to "protect" your children/employees/etc from accesing certain websites? Most of these have EULA and are installed by proper IT personnel or by the admin of the machine. Do you think they are ethical or unethical from the end-user perpective? Could be considered ethical in cases like when your 8 years old child is browsing the Net to protect him/her from strangers? Would you agree to install this kind of software at schools to monitor your children activities? Would you install it at your home? What about the corporate environment? If we go 20 years backwards and someone was sneaking your papers/folders you could probably sue him/her/the company. Nowadays it seems the story is the opposite and the company could fire you without explanations if you were browsing some "illegal" site. Do you think this kind of software should be enforced or losen at the workplace? I'm just trying to get an overall picture about pros/cons of this type of software and its implementation from the technical and legal perspective. Any thoughts/comments will be really appreciated. Thank you Fabio Cerullo
Current thread:
- Cybernanny ethics... Fabio Cerullo (Jun 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cybernanny ethics... jmbreci (Jun 06)