Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Re: Firewall load balacing switches
From: "Ivan ." <ivanhec () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 09:47:26 +1000
read up on Netscreen NSRP active-active, it isn't as easy as you think, as there is no VRRP like address that you can point to, but rather have to setup default routes on workstations, half to one netscreen and the other half the second netscreen in the cluster, as they maintain there own addresses for interfaces in active-active mode. This book covers it "Configuring Juniper Networks Netscreen & Ssg Firewalls" there are better solutions for load balancing, like the F5s cheers Ivan On 10 May 2007 20:01:38 -0000, cybit21 () hotmail com <cybit21 () hotmail com> wrote:
Juniper Netscreen devices configured in ACTIVE - ACTIVE
Current thread:
- Firewall load balacing switches sami seclist (May 10)
- RE: Firewall load balacing switches Laundrup, Jens (May 10)
- Re: Firewall load balacing switches jerome decool (May 10)
- Re: Firewall load balacing switches hmartin (May 11)
- Re: Firewall load balacing switches Shreyas Zare (May 14)
- Re: Firewall load balacing switches Karsten Iwen (May 14)
- Re: Firewall load balacing switches sami seclist (May 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re: Firewall load balacing switches cybit21 (May 10)
- Re: Re: Firewall load balacing switches Ivan . (May 11)
- Re: Re: Firewall load balacing switches Sean Krause (May 14)
- SV: Re: Firewall load balacing switches Ove DalgÄrd Hansen (May 15)
- Re: SV: Re: Firewall load balacing switches Karsten Iwen (May 15)