Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: Securing workstations from IT guys
From: Big Joe Jenkins <swarzkopf () legolas sinnerz us>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:06:40 -0500 (EST)
No. Company property is exactly that- even more so if your HR/infosec folks are bright enough to force all employees to sign an acceptible use policy/statement of non-privacy stating such at their hire.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Petter Bruland wrote:
I think installing key logger software is stepping over the line. Although it's company assets, isn't there some sort of privacy law that makes this illegal? -Petter -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Nick Vaernhoej Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:41 PM To: security-basics Subject: RE: Securing workstations from IT guys A key logger? At what point are we crossing the line of common decency towards co-workers? I realize it is company property and all, but if you log access to sensitive files and audit these logs do you really need to be more intrusive? This is not an attack, more a tagged on question to everyone? Is keystroke logging commonly accepted by you? Nick Vaernhoej "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." -----Original Message----- From: listbounce () securityfocus com [mailto:listbounce () securityfocus com] On Behalf Of Vandenberg, Robert Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:18 AM To: security-basics Subject: RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Those are good points. I would recommend that you put in a keystroke logger program with the written approval of your upper management on the PCs in question and then download the logs each day. That way you are able to create a forensics "e-Trail" that can be used to confront/counsel/etc. them. I would also make sure that you look at your documenation and ensure that each IT person has signed a document stating that they will not use their abilities improperly. Combine those two and you have a means of pursuing them legally. This electronic transmission is intended for the addressee (s) named above. It contains information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from use and disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copy, or dissemination of this transmission or the taking of any action in reliance on its contents, or other use is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender that this message was received in error and then delete this message. Thank you.
Current thread:
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys, (continued)
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Holtz,Robert (Nov 27)
- Re: Securing workstations from IT guys Micheal Espinola Jr (Nov 29)
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Vandenberg, Robert (Nov 27)
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Nick Vaernhoej (Nov 28)
- Network protocol analyzers Malhoit, Lauren (Nov 28)
- Re: Network protocol analyzers Michael R. Martinez (Nov 28)
- RE: Network protocol analyzers Chris Boczko (Nov 28)
- Re: Network protocol analyzers crazy frog crazy frog (Nov 28)
- Re: Securing workstations from IT guys James Alcasid (Nov 28)
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Petter Bruland (Nov 28)
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Big Joe Jenkins (Nov 28)
- Re: Securing workstations from IT guys Eric Marden (Nov 29)
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Vandenberg, Robert (Nov 29)
- Re: Securing workstations from IT guys Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (Nov 29)
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Nick Vaernhoej (Nov 29)
- Removable media Worrell, Brian (Nov 30)
- Re: Removable media Albert R. Campa (Nov 30)
- Re: Securing workstations from IT guys Vinny (Nov 29)
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Craig Wright (Nov 29)
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Frary, Brock (Nov 29)
- RE: Securing workstations from IT guys Nick Vaernhoej (Nov 29)