Security Basics mailing list archives
Re: Email security - gateway
From: "Jason Thompson" <securitux () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:58:20 -0500
We've had stellar feedback from customers on IronPort. We have had customers on other mail gateways and this one seems to be by far the most popular. The boxes are rock solid and very easy to manage. We've sent out a number of demos and they don't ever seem to come back :) I don't work for IronPort, FYI :) Security consulting and integration. Now Cisco has bought them though, so it will be interesting to see if Cisco applies the standard Cisco security product integration scheme of slapping a 4 digit number on the box, naming it theirs, and ruining it. But right now it's enormously popular. -J On Jan 8, 2008 1:25 PM, WALI <hkhasgiwale () gmail com> wrote:
Hi guys I am looking for something to act as an all in one gateway for my incoming/outgoing mails. Have been using a product for a combined AntiSpam/Antivirus but it's not performing well. Not a core AntiSpam company. is though good as catching viruses at the gateway level. Someone suggests that we go for two different products and chain them together so incoming mails pass through AntiSpam and then another Antivirus before they land in our Exchange server. Any suggestions, on edge mail security design and products?
Current thread:
- RE: Email security - gateway, (continued)
- RE: Email security - gateway Bill Lavalette (Jan 08)
- Re: Email security - gateway Josh Haft (Jan 08)
- Re: Email security - gateway John Mason Jr (Jan 08)
- RE: Email security - gateway Krzyston, Randy (Jan 09)
- RE: Email security - gateway Wilson Mosquera Q. (Jan 09)
- Re: Email security - gateway Deanosaur (Jan 09)
- RE: Email security - gateway Weir, Jason (Jan 09)
- Re: Email security - gateway Kurt Buff (Jan 09)
- RE: Email security - gateway Kevin Ortloff (Jan 09)
- RE: Email security - gateway Petter Bruland (Jan 10)
- Re: Email security - gateway Jason Thompson (Jan 14)