Re: SSL VPN

["Ivan ." <ivanhec () gmail com>]

one would assume that a clientless solution would require less
management overhead

This may help - VPN Decision Guide
http://www.juniper.net/solutions/literature/white_papers/200232.pdf

cheers
Ivan

On Jan 17, 2008 10:49 AM, Chad Loder <cloder () loder us> wrote:
> On Tue Jan 15/2008 @  8:01:P +0530 asdasd, Kartik wrote:
> > Hi List,
> >
> > Currently we have 100+ home users who connect to our VPN gateway
> > (IPSEC) and access the resources. As the business is growing, within a
> > couple of months we'll be having more than 300 users operating from
> > home.
> >
> > Management asked us to give them a "cost effective" solution to
> > migrate the existing home users to "SSL VPN" so that there won't be
> > any requirement of installing the software client etc (keeping in mind
> > that the associates working from home will be growing) and it will be
> > more secure.
>
> Can you explain, in more detail, the perceived need for the SSL VPN?
> If the only reason is "We don't want a software client", then there
> would be no reason to switch away from IPSEC since all major operating
> systems include a built-in IPSEC client.