Security Basics mailing list archives
RE: SMTP behind NAT
From: "Murda Mcloud" <murdamcloud () bigpond com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 11:27:25 +1000
Egress filtering is part of being a "good netizen". If something that doesn't belong has gotten into your network, it's nice to not be the vector that spreads it to others.
Hear, hear. I hadn't really thought of it along those lines, David-being the selfish mug that I am. Quite zen, when I think about it. Interconnectedness of all beings these days; in an electronic sense at least.
or blocking legitimate activity.
And these days, I am even worried by legit activity, in terms of the potential for damage. Firewalls aren't going to protect me if my kids download malicious files via msn etc. But having limits(firewalls/proxies etc) on outgoing traffic may alert me to that and also can cut down the attack space in the first place. How many 'legit' sites have been found to be hosting malicious files? I can imagine that there are many corporate LAN's spamming the world. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: InfoSec Institute Need to pass the CISSP? InfoSec Institute's CISSP Boot Camp in both Instructor-Led and Online formats is the most concentrated exam prep available. Comprehensive course materials and an expert instructor means you pass the exam. Gain a laser like insight into what is covered on the exam, with zero fluff! http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/cissp_bootcamp_training.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- SMTP behind NAT Georg Pichler (May 01)
- RE: SMTP behind NAT Michael.Randazzo (May 01)
- Re: SMTP behind NAT Laurens Vets (May 01)
- Message not available
- Re: SMTP behind NAT Georg Pichler (May 04)
- Re: SMTP behind NAT Aaron Howell (May 04)
- RE: SMTP behind NAT Murda Mcloud (May 05)
- Re: SMTP behind NAT Georg Pichler (May 06)
- RE: SMTP behind NAT Murda Mcloud (May 06)
- RE: SMTP behind NAT David Gillett (May 07)
- RE: SMTP behind NAT Murda Mcloud (May 07)
- RE: SMTP behind NAT Tariq Naik (May 08)
- Re: SMTP behind NAT bartlettNSF (May 11)
- Re: SMTP behind NAT Georg Pichler (May 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: SMTP behind NAT Rob Taylor (May 01)
- Re: SMTP behind NAT krymson (May 07)