Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Security through obscurity, etc.
From: jason () dickory sdsu edu (Jason Matthews)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1994 12:30:06 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 29 Nov 1994, That Whispering Wolf... wrote:
Why doesn't 8lgm, instead of posting exploit scripts, post DETAILED KNOWLEDGE of the bug, including source snippets if they can, so that those of us that are capable can diagnose our own systems, work around bugs (etc), while the average joe-on-the-street doesn't just have a plug- and-go attack on a system. Any hacker with the ability to turn bug details into an exploit script probably already knows about the bugs anyhow. Well, this is just my $.02. I think if 8lgm continues they way they're going (with things like their SCO 'login' problem -- Which basically said "There's a bug, no fix and no workaround, so nyah"), I'd rather just see them go away. I echo Pat's comments (I think that was Pat) about only needing one CERT.
I would rather have 8lgm then CERT. Jason
Current thread:
- Re: Security through obscurity, etc. Jason Matthews (Dec 12)
- Re: Security through obscurity, etc. jsz (Dec 12)
- Re: Security through obscurity, etc. Jason Matthews (Dec 12)
- Re: Security through obscurity, etc. jsz (Dec 13)
- Re: Security through obscurity, etc. joshua geller (Dec 13)
- No more religious wars please! (was Re: Security through obscurity, Christopher Samuel (Dec 13)
- Re: Security through obscurity, etc. James M. Chacon (Dec 13)
- Re: Security through obscurity, etc. Oliver Friedrichs (Dec 13)
- Re: Security through obscurity, etc. Leo Bicknell (Dec 13)
- Re: Security through obscurity, etc. Oliver Friedrichs (Dec 13)
- Re: Security through obscurity, etc. Jason Matthews (Dec 12)
- Re: Security through obscurity, etc. Jim Littlefield (Dec 14)
- Re: Security through obscurity, etc. jsz (Dec 12)