Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: permissions
From: casper () fwi uva nl (Casper Dik)
Date: Tue, 17 May 94 17:26:25 +0200
/ rw,nosuid /usr ro /var rw,nosuid /home rw,nosuid /tmp rw,nosuid /usr/local roexcellent thinking. Does anyone have any problems with this philosophy? I noticed some systems around here with /sbin/su and /sbin/sulogin. These would be disabled if the above conditions were met. Is this a problem? Anything else break?
If you have systems with /sbin/su and /sbin/sulogin it might just be Solaris 2.x machines. On Solaris 2.x, nosuid is a combination of nosuid and nodev. Using nosuid on / sort of breaks things there. Also, tmpfs mount in Solaris does not understand the nosuid option which means you might end up with /tmp in /. I have a new mount_tmpfs program for those of you interested in nosuid /tmp for Solaris 2.3. Casper
Current thread:
- Re: permissions Bruce Barnett (May 17)
- Re: permissions Casper Dik (May 17)
- Re: permissions Howard the Energizer (May 17)
- Re: permissions Perry E. Metzger (May 17)
- Re: permissions Howard the Energizer (May 17)
- Re: permissions Bruce Gingery (May 17)
- Re: permissions Perry E. Metzger (May 17)
- Re: permissions Daniel Azuelos (May 17)
- Re: permissions rik.harris () vifp monash edu au (May 18)
- bin ownership problem Brian Parent (May 18)
- Re: bin ownership problem jmc () gnu ai mit edu (May 18)
- Re: bin ownership problem Casper Dik (May 19)
- Re: bin ownership problem Perry E. Metzger (May 19)
(Thread continues...)