Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Sendmail 8.6.10: what's different?
From: iga () sovam com (Igor V. Semenyuk)
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 1995 02:59:02 +0300 (MMT)
I diffed 8.6.10 against what I was previously running (8.6.8). Significant changes from bugtraq's point of view are mostly being more paranoid about believing strings coming from possibly-untrustworthy sources. Here's the list:
Well, perhaps the list would have been more cleaner had you diffed against 8.6.9 or get sendmail.8.6.10.patch from ftp.cs.berkeley.edu - it's 25K size. Does anyone know if IDA sendmail is vulnerable? CERT advisory doesn't mention it - is it because IDA considered obsoleted or because it is clean? -- Igor V. Semenyuk Internet: iga () sovam com SOVAM Teleport Phone: +7 095 956 3008 Moscow, Russia
Current thread:
- CERT Advisory CA-95:05.sendmail.vulnerabilities (fwd), (continued)
- CERT Advisory CA-95:05.sendmail.vulnerabilities (fwd) Paul 'Shag' Walmsley (Feb 22)
- Re: CERT Advisory CA-95:05.sendmail.vulnerabilities (fwd) Dave Schweisguth (Feb 23)
- Sendmail 8.6.9 security hole Igor V. Semenyuk (Feb 22)
- Re: Sendmail 8.6.9 security hole Christopher Samuel (Feb 23)
- Sun Security Bulletin #129 (sendmail) Mark Graff (Feb 22)
- new sendmail bug? James W. Abendschan (Feb 22)
- Re: new sendmail bug? joel (Feb 22)
- Re: new sendmail bug? Dave Horsfall (Feb 22)
- Sendmail 8.6.10: what's different? der Mouse (Feb 23)
- X keyboard sniffing Paul Howell (Feb 23)
- Re: Sendmail 8.6.10: what's different? Igor V. Semenyuk (Feb 23)
- Re: Sendmail 8.6.10: what's different? Peter Wemm (Feb 24)
- Re: Sendmail 8.6.10: what's different? Peter Wemm (Feb 23)
- Re: Sendmail 8.6.10: what's different? Christian Wettergren (Feb 24)
- Re: new sendmail bug? Michael Van Norman (Feb 23)
- Re: snooper watchers Aleph One (Feb 22)
- Re: HP-UX Problem... Pete Shipley (Feb 21)