Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory )

From: pwh () bradley bradley edu (Pete Hartman)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 95 22:21:34 -0600

But in real life, the spoofing machine would never be requested to respond
to arp anyway, because in real life the spoofer should be on the other side
of your firewall router.  If the spoofer and spoofee are on the same ether-
net then there are serious internal problems that go beyond the scope of
firewalls!!


But such problems are the stock-in-trade of those of us at Universities.

Current thread:

Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ), (continued)
- - - Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Brian J. Murrell (Jan 26)
    - BOUNCE TEST Scott Chasin (Jan 27)
    - Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Jon Peatfield (Jan 27)
    - Chances of guessing? Leo Bicknell (Jan 27)
    - Re: Chances of guessing? Timothy Newsham (Jan 27)
  - Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Darren Reed (Jan 26)
    - Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Pete Shipley (Jan 26)
  - old post on securing a sunos 4.1.* box joshua geller (Jan 30)
    - Re: old post on securing a sunos 4.1.* box pluvius (Jan 30)
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) smb () research att com (Jan 26)
- Re: Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Pete Hartman (Jan 26)
  - Re: Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Jonathan M. Bresler (Jan 27)
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) Jonathan M. Bresler (Jan 27)
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) smb () research att com (Jan 27)
- Re: Router filtering not enough! (Was: Re: CERT advisory ) anonymous () some lame netcom not site (Jan 30)
  - list leadership Robert M. Haas (Jan 31)
    - Anonymous mailings Adam Shostack (Jan 31)