Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Windows 95 Espionage ( ?? )
From: konczal () CSMES NCSL NIST GOV (Joe Konczal)
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 1995 10:03:33 -0400
"Jonathan" == Jonathan Stott <jstott () poly phys cwru edu> writes:
Jonathan> It's more or less a hoax. ... It's not so much a hoax as a misunderstanding. Many people seem to think that any code that does something unexpected or malicious, that you don't want it to do, without getting your permission or telling you, is a virus. Apparently the program does send your directory structure to Microsoft. They seem to have carefully avoided denying that, if their statement was reported accurately on bugtraq. Here is something interesting from RISKS.
Another [...] risk, is people outside the US posting crypto code to USENET, for instance my sig file below implements RSA encryption in 3 lines of perl. If you are not familiar with encryption schemes, RSA is one of the most secure public key encryption schemes, and is the one used in PGP. It is also very firmly on the ITAR export control list. Information on the sig is at: http://dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/ Some US folks are printing a T-shirt with this code on it, in honour of ITAR, to produce an export controlled "munitions" T-shirt.
Current thread:
- Re: Windows 95 Espionage ( ?? ) Peter Sivo (Jun 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Windows 95 Espionage ( ?? ) Jan Vandenbos (Jun 06)
- Re: Windows 95 Espionage ( ?? ) John Mayo - NSM (Jun 06)
- Re: Windows 95 Espionage ( ?? ) George Mullins (Jun 06)
- Re: Windows 95 Espionage ( ?? ) Jonathan Stott (Jun 06)
- Re: Windows 95 Espionage ( ?? ) Joe Konczal (Jun 07)
- Re: Windows 95 Espionage ( ?? ) Matthew SAMS (Jun 06)
- Re: Windows 95 Espionage ( ?? ) Larry Kealey (Jun 06)
- Re: Windows 95 Espionage ( ?? ) Matthew SAMS (Jun 06)
- Re: Windows 95 Espionage ( ?? ) Tatu Ylonen (Jun 06)
- Re: Windows 95 Espionage ( ?? ) Heath I Hunnicutt (Jun 07)
- Re: Windows 95 Espionage ( ?? ) tws () wh bayer com (Jun 07)
- Re: Windows 95 Espionage ( ?? ) -Reply RFORNO (Jun 07)