Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods
From: fc () all net (Dr. Frederick B. Cohen)
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 1995 16:18:20 -0500 (EST)
In the tech notes that I have, it would seemt that RC2 uses a 128bit key and RC4 uses a 256bit key. Both these keys seem rather small in comparison to something like PGP's 1028bit key.
128bit key is about 40 digits - NSA approved - breakable by a PC in a few hours. FC
Current thread:
- Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods Dr. Frederick B. Cohen (Mar 14)
- Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods Perry E. Metzger (Mar 14)
- Re: Lotus Notes Encryption Methods Vishy Gopalakrishnan (Mar 14)
- Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Jonathan Cooper (Mar 15)
- Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Mark G. Scheuern (Mar 15)
- Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! That Whispering Wolf... (Mar 16)
- Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Software Test Account (Mar 16)
- Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Adam Shostack (Mar 17)
- Re: Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Allan Sutton (Mar 17)
- Non-PK encryption not vulnerable via low key length?! Jonathan Cooper (Mar 15)
- Problems with wuftpd - password logging(?) DaVe McComb (Mar 16)