Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: BUG in /bin/bash
From: dreamer () garrison inetcan net (Digital Dreamer)
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 19:19:59 -0600
On Thu, 22 Aug 1996, Red Barchetta wrote:
Their test string "bash -c 'ls\377who'" gave this output on my Solaris 2.5 system: bash: ls377who: command not found Can anyone verify that this is really a problem? Ernie Pistor
The following program demonstrated it on this Linux machine. -> snip #include <stdio.h> void main(void) { system("ls\377w"); } -> snip
Current thread:
- BUG in /bin/bash Seven Up (Aug 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BUG in /bin/bash Red Barchetta (Aug 22)
- Re: BUG in /bin/bash The Ghost who Admins (Aug 22)
- Re: BUG in /bin/bash Digital Dreamer (Aug 22)
- Re: BUG in /bin/bash Earle Ake (Aug 22)
- IE 3.0? InterAccess Support Manager (Aug 22)
- Re: IE 3.0? Dave Andersen (Aug 23)
- More on the UnixWare problem Todd Vierling (Aug 23)
- resolv+ and finger... C. Hodges (Aug 23)
- Vulnerability in the Xt library Aleph One (Aug 24)
- Re: Vulnerability in the Xt library Stefan `Sec` Zehl (Aug 25)
- Re: Vulnerability in the Xt library Mike Neuman (Aug 27)
- Re: Vulnerability in the Xt library Casper Dik (Aug 28)
- Re: Vulnerability in the Xt library Mike Neuman (Aug 28)