Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: /dev/openprom problems - Solaris 1 or Solaris 2
From: newsham () aloha net (Tim Newsham)
Date: Tue, 28 May 1996 11:30:04 -1000
5) It makes vastly more sense for sun (or or any other OS development team) to spend time on new features, instead of fixing "problems" where priviledged users "can" crash their own machines (/oh boy! I get to crash a machine I'm responsible for!/). Consider: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/dsk/c0t3d0s1. This is a generally bad thing to do, but I sure don't want _any_ vendor to waste time disallowing dd'ing to certain partitions. (If someone tries out that dd command, I'm not responsible for the results.)
oh this is just silly. part of "spend(ing) time on new features" is debugging them. If your system has a bug (crashing sun by reading the openrom is a bug, in case you werent sure) then it should be fixed. Really, how much effort do you estimate will be taken by fixing this simple bug? The coding itself will be trivial, the only factor is the additional testing and distribution of patches. dd'ing to a device is not a bug, though its probably a good idea to disallow writing to a mounted partition (as is done in some systems). Tim N.
Current thread:
- Re: /dev/openprom problems - Solaris 1 or Solaris 2 Tim Newsham (May 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: /dev/openprom problems - Solaris 1 or Solaris 2 Scott Reynolds (May 28)