Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: Pine's re-occuring nightmare

From: MRC () CAC WASHINGTON EDU (Mark Crispin)
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 1997 11:10:12 -0700


I suggest that you check further.

The fact that Pine 3.96 write a /tmp file with protection 666 does not mean
that it is vulnerable to a symlink problem.

Current thread:

Pine's re-occuring nightmare jericho () DIMENSIONAL COM (Sep 01)
- MS responds to Exchange Server 5.0 POP3 Security problem Manley, Jim W (Sep 01)
- Re: Pine's re-occuring nightmare Mark Crispin (Sep 01)
- HP UX Bug :) Leonid S Knyshov (Sep 01)
  - Re: HP UX Bug :) Brian Mitchell (Sep 02)
  - in.comsat DoS vulnerability Andrew Hobgood (Sep 02)
  - You can find jizz.c here T o r g (Sep 03)
  - You can find jizz.c here anonymous () ANONYMOUS ORG (Sep 03)
  - [linux-security] Announce: chkexploit 1.13 (fwd) iON BARRiER (Sep 04)
    - Re: [linux-security] Announce: chkexploit 1.13 (fwd) W.C. Epperson (Sep 04)
    - [Alert] Website's uploader.exe (from demo) vulnerable Aleph One (Sep 04)
    - Overflow in one of Apache 1.1.1 (maybe later too)'s modules Matt Conover (Sep 04)
    - Re: Overflow in one of Apache 1.1.1 (maybe later too)'s modules Artur Pydo - EuroBretagne (Sep 05)

(Thread continues...)