Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: bonk.c
From: jsonneve () FORCE STWING UPENN EDU (Jord Sonneveld)
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 22:19:09 -0500
Using boink.c (a modified bonk, available from http://www.rootshell.com), I noticed that not all Win95/NT boxes come to a screeching halt. Sometimes, 95 and NT time out for a while, mouse moves slow, etc. I have only tested this on machines with ALL the latest patches applied. The machines were pretty much identical and I do not know why some timed out and some crashed with regular boink. However, when I specified 127.0.0.1 as the source address for the packet, I got a very pretty blue screen in every case (which for me is five 95 boxes and four NT boxes). My options for boink scanned between ports 1 and 27000, sending 1 packet. J\S
Current thread:
- Security flaw in either DIT TransferPro or Solaris The Man (Jan 05)
- Re: Security flaw in either DIT TransferPro or Solaris The Man (Jan 07)
- NetWare NFS Andrew J. Anderson (Jan 08)
- New DOS exploit for NT and Win95 (CONFIRMED?) Aleph One (Jan 08)
- bonk.c Aleph One (Jan 08)
- Re: bonk.c Jord Sonneveld (Jan 10)
- riptrace.c Aleph One (Jan 08)
- Re: riptrace.c Christopher Masto (Jan 08)
- Re: riptrace.c Alfred Huger (Jan 08)
- Nifty Security hole on Several NT Based Web Servers Aleph One (Jan 09)
- Re: riptrace.c Theo de Raadt (Jan 09)
- Re: riptrace.c Hubert Feyrer (Jan 08)
- Source for NEWTEAR.C Aleph One (Jan 09)
- Re: riptrace.c Christopher Masto (Jan 08)