Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Fwd: Any user can panic OpenBSD machine
From: mouse () RODENTS MONTREAL QC CA (der Mouse)
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 08:24:16 -0400
Shouldn't the internal sum better be 64-bit? After all, FFS is able to do files > 2^32 bytes...read(2), etc. return the number of bytes transferred - so it must be within an unsigned machine word.
In practice, within a signed word, given the amount of code that tests for <0 instead of ==-1.
On OSs where the ABI supports large machine words than 32-bits, then files over 2/4GB are indeed possible.
I don't quite get what you mean. What does the amount of data transferrable in a single read/readv have to do with file size? There's nothing difficult about files >4G on a 32-bit machine, provided a >32-bit signed integral type is available for off_t. der Mouse mouse () rodents montreal qc ca 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Current thread:
- Re: netscape mail overflow(another one), (continued)
- Re: netscape mail overflow(another one) Paul Boehm (Jul 29)
- who Paul Boehm (Jul 28)
- Re: Fwd: Any user can panic OpenBSD machine Chris Wedgwood (Jul 28)
- Re: Fwd: Any user can panic OpenBSD machine Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav (Jul 27)
- Re: Fwd: Any user can panic OpenBSD machine Todd C. Miller (Jul 27)
- Re: Fwd: Any user can panic OpenBSD machine Peter Jeremy (Jul 27)
- Re: Fwd: Any user can panic OpenBSD machine Chris Wedgwood (Jul 27)
- Re: Fwd: Any user can panic OpenBSD machine Joshua Cope (Jul 28)
- Re: Fwd: Any user can panic OpenBSD machine Jason Thorpe (Jul 28)
- Re: Fwd: Any user can panic OpenBSD machine Todd C. Miller (Jul 28)
- Re: Fwd: Any user can panic OpenBSD machine der Mouse (Jul 29)