Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: [Linux] glibc 2.1.x / wu-ftpd <=2.5 / BeroFTPD / lynx / vlock / mc / glibc 2.0.x
From: daw () CS BERKELEY EDU (David Wagner)
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 21:48:27 -0700
In article <14282.6738.523996.809083 () floh privat circular de>, Norbert Warmuth <nwarmuth () PRIVAT CIRCULAR DE> wrote:
An off-by-one error, hardly to exploit especially since the value written is always '\0'.
Relying on that to protect you may not be prudent. See http://www.geog.ubc.ca/snag/bugtraq/msg03213.html for an example of an off-by-one error which only allowed to write a '\0' yet was exploited in the field (!).
Current thread:
- Re: [Linux] glibc 2.1.x / wu-ftpd <=2.5 / BeroFTPD / lynx / vlock / mc / glibc 2.0.x Norbert Warmuth (Aug 29)
- Re: [Linux] glibc 2.1.x / wu-ftpd <=2.5 / BeroFTPD / lynx / vlock / mc / glibc 2.0.x Norbert Warmuth (Sep 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Linux] glibc 2.1.x / wu-ftpd <=2.5 / BeroFTPD / lynx / vlock / mc / glibc 2.0.x David Wagner (Sep 01)