Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: non-exec stack
From: gert () GREENIE MUC DE (Gert Doering)
Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 21:12:51 +0200
Hi, On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 10:06:04AM +0200, Casper Dik wrote:
Here's an overflow exploit that works on a non-exec stack on x86 boxes. It demonstrates how it is possible to thread together several libc calls. I have not seen any other exploits for x86 that have done this..Non-executable stacks do not work in Solaris/x86. It is impossible to give page level protection that prevents execution on the x86 architecture.
Hmmm, so how do they do that on Linux? I thought Solar Designer had a non-exec-stack patch for Linux. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert () greenie muc de fax: +49-89-35655025 gert.doering () physik tu-muenchen de
Current thread:
- non-exec stack Tim Newsham (May 06)
- "I don't think I really love you" Michal Zalewski (May 07)
- Re: non-exec stack Casper Dik (May 08)
- Re: non-exec stack Gert Doering (May 09)
- Re: non-exec stack Casper Dik (May 09)
- Re: non-exec stack Nate Eldredge (May 10)
- »Ø¸´: Re: non-exec stac ZhaoQian (May 10)
- Alert: IIS ism.dll exposes file contents Cerberus Security Team (May 11)
- ISSalert: Internet Security Systems Security Advisory: Microsoft IIS Remote Denial of Service Attack Warren Barrow (May 11)
- Remote DoS attack in Internet Information Server 4.0 & 5.0 "Malformed Extension Data in URL" Vulnerability Ussr Labs (May 11)
- Microsoft Security Bulletin (MS00-030) Microsoft Product Security (May 11)
- IE Domain Confusion Vulnerability Foo Bar (May 11)
- Overflow in Outlook Express 4.* - too long filenames with graphic format extension Ultor (May 12)
- Eudora Sensitive to Long Filenames Ron Moritz (May 18)
- Re: non-exec stack Gert Doering (May 09)