Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3)
From: Jason Clifford <jason () uklinux net>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 18:59:04 +0100 (BST)
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Chris Adams wrote:
Better yet, have your POP daemon update the access file directly, and then you don't have any of the hokey "tail the log file" stuff going on at all. All you need to add is a daemon to remove entries from the access file.
All of which is an awful horrendous hack. SMTP AUTH is fairly easy to implement. It's reliable. You don't have to worry about IPs being accidentally left in a hash resulting in unwanted relaying and you can properly trace the sender of mails. Jason
Current thread:
- poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3) Andrea Barisani (Jul 04)
- Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3) Will DeHaan (Jul 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3) Ram'on Reyes Carri'on (Jul 06)
- Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3) Christopher X. Candreva (Jul 07)
- Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3) Chris Adams (Jul 09)
- Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3) Todd R. Eigenschink (Jul 09)
- Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3) bdoctor (Jul 09)
- Re[2]: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3) Christoph Kuhles (Jul 09)
- Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3) Jason Clifford (Jul 09)
- Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3) Walter Reed (Jul 09)
- Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem (Cobalt Raq3) Christopher X. Candreva (Jul 07)
- Re: poprelayd and sendmail relay authentication problem Ed Ravin (Jul 07)