Bugtraq mailing list archives

RE: CERT Advisory CA-2001-25

From: "Jeremy Epstein" <jepstein () webmethods com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:20:39 -0400

My guess is that this does not affect TIS FWTK... I was told that pretty
much all of the TIS/FWTK code has been rewritten for Gauntlet over the
years.  So odds are it's Gauntlet-specific.

--Jeremy

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Watt [mailto:steve+bugtraq () Watt COM]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 12:31 AM

So, does anyone know whether this thoroughly useless advisory
affects those who are running smap/smapd from the TIS FWTK days?
Or is the overflow a newly introduced feature?

Current thread:

CERT Advisory CA-2001-25 CERT Advisory (Sep 06)
- Re: CERT Advisory CA-2001-25 Steve Watt (Sep 10)
  - Re: CERT Advisory CA-2001-25 (smap overflow) Keith Young (Sep 10)
    - Re: CERT Advisory CA-2001-25 (smap overflow) Keith Young (Sep 16)
  - Re: CERT Advisory CA-2001-25 Ian Finlay (Sep 10)
  - RE: CERT Advisory CA-2001-25 Jeremy Epstein (Sep 10)
    - RE: CERT Advisory CA-2001-25 Carson Gaspar (Sep 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CERT Advisory CA-2001-25 ark (Sep 11)