Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2
From: Henning Rust <Henning.Rust () stud uni-hannover de>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:37:54 +0200 (MEST)
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Marco Ivaldi wrote:
What if Verisign is planning to open more similar TCP/IP services on that host? What if they're going to further modify the existing ones, to better invade individuals' privacy?
Up to now, e-mails addressed to misspelled mail domains will not be sent to Verisign's Fake-SMTP-service as MX records are used for mail-domain resolving. Verisign did not set up wildcard MX records. However, if you configure your E-Mail-Program or local Mail-Transfer-Agent and misspell the hostname of the SMTP-Server for outgoing mail, all outgoing mail will be sent to their Fake-SMTP service. What if Versign is planning to add wildcard MX records as well, so that any mail addressed to mistyped/non-existant mail domains like "foobar () sdfsgggdfasfasdf com" will be sent to their fake SMTP service? Expect the worst! hepp... Henning --
Current thread:
- Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service Richard M. Smith (Sep 24)
- Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Mark Coleman (Sep 24)
- Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Marco Ivaldi (Sep 24)
- Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Diego Bitencourt Contezini (Sep 24)
- Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Henning Rust (Sep 25)
- Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Niels Bakker (Sep 25)
- Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Marco Ivaldi (Sep 24)
- Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 der Mouse (Sep 24)
- Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Hugo van der Kooij (Sep 24)
- Message not available
- Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Timothy J. Biggs (Sep 25)
- Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2 Mark Coleman (Sep 24)