Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: base64
From: Bennett Todd <bet () rahul net>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 14:11:18 -0400
2003-09-25T16:20:46 Alun Jones:
-----Original Message----- From: Bennett Todd [mailto:bet () rahul net] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:30 AM Do all this canonicalization before the message hits your attachment type policy enforcement and malware scanner, so they only have to deal with the common forms that everybody handles the same.With the obvious disadvantage that we're all reduced to using the lowest-common-subset of functionality.
Absolutely.
Never mind inventing or supporting new features, or adding international file naming support, in your new email client, because the mail server will strip all of that out, anyway. I don't think that's an appropriate answer.
It's certainly not the appropriate answer for all settings. Outlaw people from receiving email on Windows, and we can do away with all this sludge. -Bennett
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: base64, (continued)
- Re: base64 MightyE (Sep 24)
- Re: base64 Buck Huppmann (Sep 24)
- Re: base64 Andrew Church (Sep 25)
- Message not available
- Re: base64 MightyE (Sep 25)
- Re: base64 Bennett Todd (Sep 25)
- Re: base64 MightyE (Sep 25)
- Re: base64 Earl Hood (Sep 26)
- Re: base64 Bennett Todd (Sep 26)
- Re[2]: base64 3APA3A (Sep 26)
- RE: base64 Alun Jones (Sep 26)
- Re: base64 Bennett Todd (Sep 26)
- Re: base64 Buck Huppmann (Sep 24)
- Re: base64 MightyE (Sep 24)
- Re: base64 Bennett Todd (Sep 26)
- Re: base64 Greg A. Woods (Sep 27)