Bugtraq mailing list archives
RE: Linux kernel IGMP vulnerabilities
From: "Wolfpaw - Dale Corse" <admin-lists () wolfpaw net>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:10:02 -0700
Is there a patch to fix this (and the other current ones?) Thanks, D.
-----Original Message----- From: matthew-bugtraq () newtoncomputing co uk [mailto:matthew-bugtraq () newtoncomputing co uk] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 3:42 PM To: Paul Starzetz Cc: stephen joseph butler; security () isec pl; bugtraq () securityfocus com Subject: Re: Linux kernel IGMP vulnerabilities On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 01:34:33PM +0100, Paul Starzetz wrote:On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, stephen joseph butler wrote:/proc/net/igmp /proc/net/mcfilter if both exist and are non-empty you are vulnerable!Just to be clear: if "mcfilter" is empty, then you aren't vulnerable? I have both files, and "igmp" contains data, but "mcfilter" is empty.You are not vulnerable to the remote attack described under (3), however your kernel may be still buggy. Note that you need arunning process thathas manipulated its multicast socket filters. If yourkernel is buggy andyou have local users such an application can always appear,at a time youdon't expect it.This afternoon I tried the exploit on my machine, which has exactly those symptoms (data in igmp, mcfilter empty). It froze solid, hard power-cycle required. -- Matthew
Current thread:
- Linux kernel IGMP vulnerabilities Paul Starzetz (Dec 14)
- Re: Linux kernel IGMP vulnerabilities Pekka Savola (Dec 14)
- Re: Linux kernel IGMP vulnerabilities stephen joseph butler (Dec 15)
- Re: Linux kernel IGMP vulnerabilities Paul Starzetz (Dec 15)
- Re: Linux kernel IGMP vulnerabilities matthew-bugtraq (Dec 15)
- RE: Linux kernel IGMP vulnerabilities Wolfpaw - Dale Corse (Dec 16)
- RE: Linux kernel IGMP vulnerabilities Jirka Kosina (Dec 17)
- Re: Linux kernel IGMP vulnerabilities Paul Starzetz (Dec 15)