Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday
From: Keith Oxenrider <koxenrider () sol-biotech com>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:44:34 -0600
For what it is worth, I have an ANSI standard C++ implementation of the sha-160/224/256/384/512 bit algorithms that auto-detects endian-ness and adjusts accordingly (tested on Wintel, Lintel and Solaris). It can be found at http://sol-biotech.com/code/sha2/ (it comes with a test suite that was developed by Aaron D. Gifford who did the C implementation I based it on). For some reason the default directory display does not list the README File, it is here: http://sol-biotech.com/code/sha2/README. I created a simple password class for creating and managing passwords based on my sha* implementation, it can be found here: http://sol-biotech.com/code/SimplePass/. I would love to have constructive feedback.
Keith Oxenrider CISSP At 10:36 PM 12/7/2004 -0600, Gandalf The White wrote:
Greetings and Salutations: <snip> I just want to make sure that the MD5 hash passwords don't end up being as easy to compute as the Cisco 7 passwords or the NTLM passwords. It actually is beginning to sound like there might be enough of a hole in MD5 that "we" (collectively) had better start working on SHA-2 hashed passwords ... Ken --------------------------------------------------------------- Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards for they are subtle and quick to anger. Ken Hollis - Gandalf The White - gandalf () digital net - O- TINLC WWW Page - http://digital.net/~gandalf/ Trace E-Mail forgery - http://digital.net/~gandalf/spamfaq.html Trolls crossposts - http://digital.net/~gandalf/trollfaq.html
Current thread:
- MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Dan Kaminsky (Dec 07)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Gandalf The White (Dec 07)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Tim (Dec 08)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Dragos Ruiu (Dec 08)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday David F. Skoll (Dec 08)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Joel Maslak (Dec 08)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Steve Friedl (Dec 08)
- RE: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday David Schwartz (Dec 08)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Gandalf The White (Dec 08)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Keith Oxenrider (Dec 08)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Paul Wouters (Dec 08)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Dan Kaminsky (Dec 08)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Paul Wouters (Dec 08)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Adam Shostack (Dec 09)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Tim (Dec 08)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Solar Designer (Dec 08)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Dan Kaminsky (Dec 08)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Pavel Kankovsky (Dec 09)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Solar Designer (Dec 13)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Gandalf The White (Dec 07)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday George Georgalis (Dec 08)
- Re: MD5 To Be Considered Harmful Someday Dan Kaminsky (Dec 08)