Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Samba 3.x + kernel 2.6.x local root vulnerability
From: Darren Reed <avalon () caligula anu edu au>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:50:47 +1100 (Australia/ACT)
Cute, so the security problems of NFS are being reinvented with SMBFS. I hope that traditional mount options such as "nosuid" will work ? Also, can you create character/block device files on an smbfs partition that you have root locally (and not remotel) to get you access to things like /dev/kmem, etc ? Darren
Current thread:
- Samba 3.x + kernel 2.6.x local root vulnerability Michal Medvecky (Feb 09)
- Re: Samba 3.x + kernel 2.6.x local root vulnerability Michael Kjorling (Feb 09)
- Re: Samba 3.x + kernel 2.6.x local root vulnerability Seth Arnold (Feb 09)
- Re: Samba 3.x + kernel 2.6.x local root vulnerability Patrick J. Volkerding (Feb 09)
- Re: Samba 3.x + kernel 2.6.x local root vulnerability Frank Louwers (Feb 11)
- Re: Samba 3.x + kernel 2.6.x local root vulnerability Urban Widmark (Feb 12)
- Re: Samba 3.x + kernel 2.6.x local root vulnerability Darren Reed (Feb 13)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Samba 3.x + kernel 2.6.x local root vulnerability Guille -bisho- (Feb 10)
- Message not available
- Re: Samba 3.x + kernel 2.6.x local root vulnerability Felipe Franciosi (Feb 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Samba 3.x + kernel 2.6.x local root vulnerability John . Airey (Feb 11)