Bugtraq mailing list archives
RE: The Linksys WRT54G "security problem" doesn't exist
From: "David Gillett" <gillettdavid () fhda edu>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 09:09:42 -0700
5) Does he really think that Cisco/Linksys would not test such a basic basic basic aspect of this router's security?Yes. How many times have "basic basic basic" aspects of security gone untested, or flaws gone unnoticed? How long was port 1900 open on my SMC Barricade? How many "basic basic basic" aspects of security has Microsoft, various Linux distros, Sun, and even MacOS X violated?
Cisco's purchase of LinkSys is still relatively recent. I've found, in the past, fundamental code flaws in products being marketed by Cisco up to a year after their acquisition of the originating company....\ Just because they've put their name on the outside of the box doesn't mean they've fully QA'd the innards. David Gillett
Current thread:
- The Linksys WRT54G "security problem" doesn't exist David Pipe (Jun 04)
- RE: The Linksys WRT54G "security problem" doesn't exist Alan W. Rateliff, II (Jun 05)
- RE: The Linksys WRT54G "security problem" doesn't exist David Gillett (Jun 07)
- Re: The Linksys WRT54G "security problem" doesn't exist insecure (Jun 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The Linksys WRT54G "security problem" doesn't exist caldcv (Jun 05)
- Re: The Linksys WRT54G "security problem" doesn't exist caldcv (Jun 14)
- RE: The Linksys WRT54G "security problem" doesn't exist Alan W. Rateliff, II (Jun 05)