Re: Is predictable spam filtering a vulnerability?

[Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu]

On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 15:52:00 +0200, Luca Berra <bluca () comedia it>  said:

> I hold that after suitable training of the spam filter (this includes
> generation of whitelists and such), dropping mail into oblivion is
> perfectly safe.

Assume a spam filter that's 99.8% accurate.  This is probably a *high*
estimate - we're talking only 2 errors per every thousand mails...

Assume several million messages a day (which is *not* a very large load
by today's standards - we're merely a large university, and even *after*
subtracting spam and virus mail, we're in that range)...

Calculate how many mails get dropped into oblivion each day.

I suspect that you and I have differing definitions of "*perfectly* safe".....

Attachment: _bin
Description: