Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: /dev/random is probably not
From: McLain Causey <mclaincausey () yahoo com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 22:48:50 -0500
*BSD uses Yarrow I think. Should also be safe from the concerns mentioned.
http://www.schneier.com/yarrow.html On Jul 2, 2005, at 9:08 AM, Thomas Wana wrote:
OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD and the like, and of course Windows family OSs.
Current thread:
- /dev/random is probably not Charles M. Hannum (Jul 01)
- Re: /dev/random is probably not Thomas Wana (Jul 02)
- Re: /dev/random is probably not McLain Causey (Jul 04)
- Re: /dev/random is probably not Chiaki (Jul 02)
- Re: /dev/random is probably not exon (Jul 04)
- Re: /dev/random is probably not Darren Reed (Jul 05)
- Re: /dev/random is probably not devnull (Jul 06)
- Re: /dev/random is probably not Thomas (Jul 06)
- Re: /dev/random is probably not Darren Reed (Jul 06)
- Re: /dev/random is probably not Thomas (Jul 06)
- Re: /dev/random is probably not Kai Howells (Jul 08)
- Re: /dev/random is probably not Stefan Bethke (Jul 08)
- Re: /dev/random is probably not exon (Jul 04)
- Re: /dev/random is probably not Francesco Messineo (Jul 12)
- Re: /dev/random is probably not Thomas Wana (Jul 02)