Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: readdir_r considered harmful
From: Ben Hutchings <ben () decadentplace org uk>
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:16:42 +0000
I wrote:
readdir_r considered harmful ============================
A second revision of this advisory (and any future revisions) can be found at <http://womble.decadentplace.org.uk/readdir_r-advisory.html>. I have updated the recommendations to cover HP-UX and Tru64 properly. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings When you say `I wrote a program that crashed Windows', people just stare ... and say `Hey, I got those with the system, *for free*'. - Linus Torvalds
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Current thread:
- readdir_r considered harmful Ben Hutchings (Nov 05)
- Re: readdir_r considered harmful Ben Hutchings (Nov 05)
- Re: readdir_r considered harmful Casper . Dik (Nov 05)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: readdir_r considered harmful Ulrich Drepper (Nov 07)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: readdir_r considered harmful Casper . Dik (Nov 07)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: readdir_r considered harmful Andrew Farmer (Nov 07)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: readdir_r considered harmful Casper . Dik (Nov 08)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: readdir_r considered harmful Ulrich Drepper (Nov 07)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: readdir_r considered harmful Casper . Dik (Nov 07)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: readdir_r considered harmful Andrew Miller (Nov 08)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: readdir_r considered harmful Ulrich Drepper (Nov 07)