Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: On classifying attacks
From: john mullee <jmullee () yahoo com>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 12:46:36 +0100 (BST)
--- Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org> wrote:
David M Chess wrote:But many of us *love* to argue about taxonomies and word meanings (it's cheaper than booze anyway). *8)1. A user-assisted remote attack. 2. A client-side remote attack. I.e., we can add "user assisted" as a class like "local" and "remote", or add types (think ICMP here).
Vulnerability Types [Optional] 1. Client-side 2. User-assisted
Questions remain: - How does one treat an SQL injection?
I think essentially the problem of trojans, phishes and poisoned data is that of masquerading. For trojans, the problem is e.g. lack of system-attention key; for Phish, lack of authentication protocols etc; and for injection, the vulnerability is in the input data scrubbing. Injection requires a bug in one place: the (web-)application code. What follows is leveraged hijacking, with perhaps masquerading as an intermediate step. .02 john ___________________________________________________________ NEW Yahoo! Cars - sell your car and browse thousands of new and used cars online! http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/
Current thread:
- Re: On classifying attacks john mullee (Apr 03)