Bugtraq mailing list archives

AW: AW: JetBox cms (search_function.php) Remote File Include


From: Frank Reißner <mail () frank-reissner de>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 09:41:49 +0200



I checked the code live on a webserver - it definitly does not work. And the
'?><?php'  does not change anything it's only one big function like the name
search_function.php also describes. They only use it to embed html-code into
the function o_O 

The function is never called in search_function.php, $relative_script_path
is also initialized in the function header if the function would be called
so no way in my eyes. 




-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Steven M. Christey [mailto:coley () mitre org] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. August 2006 01:57
An: bugtraq () securityfocus com
Betreff: Re: AW: JetBox cms (search_function.php) Remote File Include


Frank Reissner said:

 //comments
 
 function phpdigSearch(){
 
 Line: 423 <?php include $relative_script_path.'/libs/htmlheader.php'
 ?>
 
 ...
 }

Please explain us how that should be exploited.

While this statement appears to be in a function declaration, there
would be nested "<?php" tags - a parse error, at least in my PHP 4.

So, this code is "live" within the script, somehow.

And, in fact, if we look at the surrounding context (at least for my
copy of search_function.php), we have this:

        else {
            $t_strings = array_merge($t_mstrings,$t_fstrings);
            phpdigParseTemplate($template,$t_strings,$table_results);
        }
    }
    
    else {
    ?>
    <?php include $relative_script_path.'/libs/htmlheader.php' ?>
    <head>
    <title><?php print $title_message ?></title>
    <?php include $relative_script_path.'/libs/htmlmetas.php' ?>


Notice the "?>" in front of the include statement, which closes off
the first bit of executable code.

So, this looks like it could be exploitable using a direct request to
search_function.php, since at the point of the include, the
$relative_script_path variable is *not* initialized.

Finally - the original pathname suggested a possible third party
module, and in fact, the affected file and referenced code matches
that of phpDig 1.8.8, so this is probably a vulnerability in phpDig
instead of Jetbox.

- Steve


Current thread: