Bugtraq mailing list archives
RE: defining 0day
From: "Marvin Simkin" <Marvin.Simkin () asu edu>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:20:35 -0700
Unpatched Vulnerability: Working Exploit
"Working in a white hat's lab" is not as urgent as "being abused right now in the wild".
. . . or maybe "zero day exploit".
Proposed: 1. A 0-day EXPLOIT is an Unpatched Vulnerability that we realize is being or has been abused. 2. A 0-day VULNERABILITY: no such thing. All vulnerabilities are either Unpatched or Patched. They start out in Unpatched status the moment some programmer creates them. They remain Unpatched until they are Patched. ------------------------------------- Marvin Simkin Manager of Information Technology School of Earth and Space Exploration Arizona State University http://simkin.asu.edu/
Current thread:
- Re: defining 0day, (continued)
- Re: defining 0day Gadi Evron (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Brian Loe (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Adrian Griffis (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Brian Loe (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Andrew Weaver (Sep 25)
- RE: defining 0day David Gillett (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Charles Miller (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Gadi Evron (Sep 25)
- Re: defining 0day Zow (Sep 27)
- Re: defining 0day Chad Perrin (Sep 27)
- RE: defining 0day Marvin Simkin (Sep 28)
- Re: defining 0day Chad Perrin (Sep 28)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Steve Shockley (Sep 25)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows Iggy E (Sep 25)
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows pdp (architect) (Sep 20)
- Message not available
- Re: 0day: PDF pwns Windows pdp (architect) (Sep 21)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Kevin Finisterre (lists) (Sep 21)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] 0day: PDF pwns Windows Aaron Collins (Sep 21)