Re: /proc filesystem allows bypassing directory permissions on Linux

[Dan Yefimov <dan () lightwave net ru>]

On 26.10.2009 18:06, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2009-10-26 15:37:50, Dan Yefimov wrote:
> > On 26.10.2009 13:54, psz () maths usyd edu au wrote:
> > > Dear Dan,
> > >
> > > > ... in authentic kernels /proc/<PID>/fd/<FD>   are symlinks ...
> > >
> > > They appear to /bin/ls as symlinks, but observation suggests that they
> > > "act" as hardlinks. Could that be fixed somehow? (I did look at the
> > > kernel fs/proc/base.c but did not make much sense to me...)
> > Just looked more carefully at fs/proc/base.c. That behavior is due
> > to proc_fd_info() called from proc_fd_link() obtains file->f_path,
> > that in turn contains the reference to the open file dentry and
> > hence inode. That's exactly why those symlinks behave as hardlinks.
> > This behavior assumes, that if you were able to open the file,
> > you've all necessary transition permissions to access it's inode.
> > But in order to follow them you need privileges to read the process
> > memory, which hardly restricts the impact of this behavior. I don't
> > think this should be fixed, since /proc/<PID>/fd/ is mainly for
> > debugging purposes.
>
> guest certianly does not have permission to ptrace() pavel's
> processes, so...

But guest has permissions to ptrace() his own processes. If we remember your 
original report, he abuses input redirection of bash run by himself. So again, 
there's no real security hole here.
--

Sincerely Your, Dan.