Bugtraq mailing list archives
Re: Web Tool Announcement: ismymailsecure.com
From: Tim <tim-security () sentinelchicken org>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:23:46 -0700
it does not - yet. This is actually what I'm working on at the moment. However, since most MTAs at the moment don't do this kind of check, it is not very useful. So the tool currently only checks for encryption capabilities, it does *not* check for protection against MiTM attacks. The next, enhanced version of the tool will have an optional check for this and also the supported ciphers.
Too bad. When you consider the attack scenarios, being vulnerable to MitM is just as bad as having no encryption. How many realistic situations can you think of in modern networking where an attacker can read someone else's TCP streams but aren't able to modify them? tim
Current thread:
- Web Tool Announcement: ismymailsecure.com Holger Rabbach (Aug 18)
- Re: Web Tool Announcement: ismymailsecure.com Chuck Swiger (Aug 23)
- Re: Web Tool Announcement: ismymailsecure.com Kari Hurtta (Aug 25)
- Re: Web Tool Announcement: ismymailsecure.com Holger Rabbach (Aug 25)
- Re: Web Tool Announcement: ismymailsecure.com Kari Hurtta (Aug 25)
- Re: Web Tool Announcement: ismymailsecure.com Holger Rabbach (Aug 25)
- Re: Web Tool Announcement: ismymailsecure.com Tim (Aug 25)
- Re: Web Tool Announcement: ismymailsecure.com Brian Behlendorf (Aug 26)
- Re: Web Tool Announcement: ismymailsecure.com Holger Rabbach (Aug 25)
- Re: Web Tool Announcement: ismymailsecure.com Tim (Aug 25)