Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode
From: Holden Williamson <limeyhaqr () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:27:13 -0300
I prefer "In the year of our Lord, one thousand nine hundred and ninety two." It sounds much more distinguished and on par with a college-level course.
Or we could all start speaking in latin, refer to it as Ano Domini and take the level of the academic posing that this entire situation has become to whole new and nausiating levels. Or we could just all stfu.
As you jump to conclusions about the ability of your fellow list readers, perhaps you could give us the benefit of the doubt and explore the possibility that it was Cisco's decision to move to so-called "virtualized processes" that surprised some of us, effectively lowering the shellcode bar and making the execution of code on Cisco gear something that can be achieved by those of us not residing on security's Mount Olympus. ;-)
I'm sorry. There's really just nothing more I can add to this. My posing-proof vest has been breached. I've lost the will to argue. <3 -holden _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunitysec com https://lists.immunitysec.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode surreal (Jul 28)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode security curmudgeon (Jul 29)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Holden Williamson (Jul 29)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode byte_jump (Jul 29)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Holden Williamson (Aug 01)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode byte_jump (Aug 01)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Holden Williamson (Aug 01)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode I)ruid (Aug 02)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Holden Williamson (Aug 02)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode I)ruid (Aug 02)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode byte_jump (Jul 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Dennis Cox (Jul 29)
- RE: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Paul Melson (Aug 01)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Holden Williamson (Aug 01)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode TAREK (Aug 02)
- Re: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode M. Shirk (Aug 02)
- RE: No sellout. was: RE: Lynn / Cisco shellcode Todd Towles (Aug 02)