Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: ProtoVer vs Lotus Domino Server 7.0
From: Daryl Tester <Daryl.Tester () iocane com au>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 09:05:56 +1030
Dave Aitel wrote:
Surely if you're implementing a complex protocol of some sort and you follow this new fangled "test driven development" fad, then clearly you've written a few fuzzers in your time.
Except TDD isn't about writing fuzzers, it's about writing successful unit tests (or their equivalent), not broken ones. I'm not sure how often fuzzers are used at a "software API" level (instead of protocol); does anyone have any stats? -- Regards, Daryl Tester, IOCANE Pty. Ltd.
Current thread:
- ProtoVer vs Lotus Domino Server 7.0 Evgeny Legerov (Feb 04)
- Re: ProtoVer vs Lotus Domino Server 7.0 Dave Aitel (Feb 04)
- Re: ProtoVer vs Lotus Domino Server 7.0 Peter Markowsky (Feb 04)
- Re: ProtoVer vs Lotus Domino Server 7.0 Daryl Tester (Feb 04)
- Re: ProtoVer vs Lotus Domino Server 7.0 Matt Hargett (Feb 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ProtoVer vs Lotus Domino Server 7.0 Chad Loder (Feb 08)
- Re: Re: ProtoVer vs Lotus Domino Server 7.0 Evgeny Legerov (Feb 08)
- Re: Re: ProtoVer vs Lotus Domino Server 7.0 Gadi Evron (Feb 12)
- Re: Re: ProtoVer vs Lotus Domino Server 7.0 Evgeny Legerov (Feb 12)
- Re: Re: ProtoVer vs Lotus Domino Server 7.0 Evgeny Legerov (Feb 08)
- Re: Re: ProtoVer vs Lotus Domino Server 7.0 Evgeny Legerov (Feb 08)
- Re: ProtoVer vs Lotus Domino Server 7.0 Dave Aitel (Feb 04)