Dailydave mailing list archives
Re: Hacking in the Republican Debate
From: "J. Craig" <3141592f () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:20:07 -0800
This hit the news for a bit in August as well: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/perry-welcomed-chinese-firm-despite-security-concern/2011/08/10/gIQAAu80EJ_story.html -jc On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Dave Aitel <dave () immunityinc com> wrote:
HARWOOD: Governor Romney, was it a mistake for Governor Schwarzenegger to hire the firm in China to build portions of that bridge? ROMNEY: Well, that's a -- a long answer to that, because what China is doing is not playing fairly by the rules that exist in our -- in the WTO and the world. China is, on almost every dimension, cheating. And we've got to recognize that. It is good for America... (APPLAUSE) ROMNEY: It is good for America to have free trade. It is good for us to be able to send our goods and services around the word and vice versa. HARWOOD: So a good decision to build the bridge over there? ROMNEY: That is normally a good thing. But China is playing by different rules. One, they are stealing intellectual property. Number two, they're hacking into our computer systems, both government and corporate. And they are stealing, by virtue of that as well, from us. And finally, they are manipulating their currency, and by doing so, holding down the price of Chinese goods, and making sure their products are artificially low-priced. It's predatory pricing, it's killing jobs in America. If I'm president of the United States, I'm making it very clear, I love free trade. I want to open markets to free trade. But I will crack down on cheaters like China. They simply cannot continue to steal our jobs. (APPLAUSE) Read more: http://thepage.time.com/2011/11/10/cnbc-transcript-of-your-money-your-vote-republican-presidential-debate/#ixzz1dJq8jZU7 GINGRICH: Well, there are two things here. And let me say in advance that I would yield in part to Governor Huntsman, because he speaks fluent Chinese, he has worked in China, and he's been the ambassador. And I'd be curious to get his reaction. But there are two different parts here. The problem with building the bridge is simple. What -- what is it about American regulations, American taxation, American labor cost and attitudes that makes it cheaper to go to China than to go to the United States? Now, we... (APPLAUSE) ... first of all, you've got to decide, how are we going to be more competitive and how are we going to be the lowest cost? And there's a new Boston consultant (ph) that says, by 2015, South Carolina and Alabama will be cheaper than the Chinese coastal provinces to manufacturing. Second, in terms of dealing with China strategically, I think we're going to have to find ways to dramatically raise the pain level for the Chinese cheating, both in the hacking side, but also on the stealing and intellectual property side. And I don't think anybody today has a particularly good strategy for doing that. Read more: http://thepage.time.com/2011/11/10/cnbc-transcript-of-your-money-your-vote-republican-presidential-debate/#ixzz1dJqHbruk -- INFILTRATE 2012 January 12th-13th in Miami - the world's best offensive information security conference. www.infiltratecon.com _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunityinc com https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
_______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave () lists immunityinc com https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
Current thread:
- Hacking in the Republican Debate Dave Aitel (Nov 10)
- Re: Hacking in the Republican Debate Dave Aitel (Nov 10)
- Re: Hacking in the Republican Debate Kristian Erik Hermansen (Nov 10)
- Re: Hacking in the Republican Debate Jeffrey Walton (Nov 10)
- Re: Hacking in the Republican Debate J. Craig (Nov 10)
- Re: Hacking in the Republican Debate Dave Aitel (Nov 10)