BreachExchange mailing list archives
Re: Breach notice: BCTGM Local 192 Union
From: lyger <lyger () attrition org>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 21:09:50 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Adam Shostack wrote: ": " Can I suggest you use a longer identifier, or are you planning to give ": " up after the first 10,000 breaches? ": " ": " ": " On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 07:25:24PM -0500, Chris Walsh wrote: ": " | This one is another from the state of North Carolina's response to my ": " | FOIA request. ": " | ": " | I am assigning it a UID of "CW-0006". We actually discussed this at length over several emails. As it stands, we still have well under 400 breaches listed in DLDOS. Even at a rate of one per day from this point forward, that would be another 26 years or so until we cross into the 5-digit realm. At that point, our future generations will probably be able to figure out how to switch out the existing identifier in mere nanoseconds. :) _______________________________________________ Dataloss Mailing List (dataloss () attrition org) http://attrition.org/dataloss Tracking more than 146 million compromised records in 349 incidents over 6 years.
Current thread:
- Breach notice: BCTGM Local 192 Union Chris Walsh (Sep 15)
- Re: Breach notice: BCTGM Local 192 Union Adam Shostack (Sep 16)
- Re: Breach notice: BCTGM Local 192 Union lyger (Sep 16)
- Re: Breach notice: BCTGM Local 192 Union Adam Shostack (Sep 16)
- Re: Breach notice: BCTGM Local 192 Union lyger (Sep 16)
- Re: Breach notice: BCTGM Local 192 Union Adam Shostack (Sep 16)