Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Image SPAM Increase?
From: Gary Flynn <flynngn () JMU EDU>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:01:46 -0400
Joe St Sauver wrote:
If you're running SpamAssassin or a SpamAssassin derivative, the weights associated with SpamAssassin tests should not be taken as cast in stone. Adjusting suitable tests upwards may be all you need to take care of the issue.
I'll check but I don't think our Mirapoint systems currently give us the capability to tune the underlying SpamAssassin engine. Also, I'm told our Mirapoint configuration is set to use Rapid-antiSPAM as an engine rather than SpamAssassin but I guess that could be changed. A question for those of you running tunable anti-spam solutions... How often do you find it necessary to tune? thanks, -- Gary Flynn Security Engineer James Madison University www.jmu.edu/computing/security
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Joe St Sauver (Apr 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Image SPAM Increase? Gary Flynn (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Ken Connelly (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Dan Oachs (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Gary Flynn (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Dave Koontz (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Gary Flynn (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Bruggeman, John (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Dave Koontz (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Gary Flynn (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Gary Flynn (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Ken Connelly (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Dan Oachs (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Les LaCroix (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Graham Toal (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Mark Borrie (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Lee Weers (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Lucas, Bryan (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? Dave Koontz (Apr 19)
- Re: Image SPAM Increase? unisog (Apr 19)
(Thread continues...)