Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: Outbound spam control
From: Chris Edwards <chris () ENG GLA AC UK>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:12:30 +0100
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Graham Toal wrote: | rate limiting on outgoing is probably the best bet; even if some | slip by at a slow rate, you're unlikely to end up in a blacklist | because of it. Yup. But also make sure alarms ring when outbound rate limits are exceeded - in order to identify the boxes spamming out, as well as throttling them. And, Richard Clayton's paper: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/extrusion.pdf suggests watching failure rates makes a better metric than simple submission rate. -- Chris Edwards, Glasgow University Computing Service
Current thread:
- Outbound spam control Andy Hooper (Jun 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Outbound spam control Brad Judy (Jun 13)
- Re: Outbound spam control Graham Toal (Jun 13)
- Re: Outbound spam control Joe St Sauver (Jun 13)
- Re: Outbound spam control Mark Borrie (Jun 13)
- Re: Outbound spam control Graham Toal (Jun 13)
- Re: Outbound spam control Chris Edwards (Jun 14)
- Re: Outbound spam control Hoffman, Michael (Jun 14)